Teravent Registry v2.0 Now Live From June 2026 - Submit your carbon removal project for review
Teravent
Access Registry
09 Technology-Based Carbon Pathway · TTS Annex A

Direct Air Capture
TTS v1.0 - Annex A

Direct Air Capture (DAC) uses engineered systems - solid sorbents, liquid solvents, moisture-swing membranes, or electrochemical cells - to chemically bind CO₂ directly from ambient air, independent of land, biomass, or growing season. Captured CO₂ is permanently sequestered through deep geological injection or mineral carbonation, delivering the highest-confidence, most measurable class of carbon removal credit in the Teravent system.

Technological TTS v1.0 Annex A ⏳ Class III · Geological ● Active
Submit DAC Project View TTS v1.0 Annex A →
>99%
Measurement accuracy
>1,000 yr
Storage timescale (Class III)
$300–$500
Current cost per tonne
4
Approved methodologies
DAC-M01 through DAC-M04
Teravent Methodology Codes · TTS Annex A
View TTS Annex A →

How this pathway works

Direct Air Capture is the only carbon removal pathway that draws CO₂ from ambient air anywhere on Earth, unconstrained by soil type, land tenure, or growing conditions. Engineered contactors pass large volumes of atmospheric air across a capture medium - a solid sorbent, a liquid solvent, a moisture-sensitive membrane, or an electrochemical cell - which selectively binds CO₂ before the medium is regenerated, typically through heat, pressure swing, or an electrochemical cycle, releasing a concentrated CO₂ stream for compression and permanent storage.

Under the Teravent Technology-Based Carbon Standard (TTS v1.0) Annex A, Direct Air Capture with Storage (DACCS) projects earn Teravent Technology Credits of the Removal type (TTC-R) for verified net tonnes of atmospheric CO₂ captured and permanently stored, net of full lifecycle project emissions. The project boundary must encompass the capture facility, all energy inputs, the transport and compression train, and the injection or mineralisation site.

Four methodology variants are approved under Annex A - from solid sorbent systems with geological injection through basalt mineralisation storage. Each methodology specifies its own capture chemistry, energy requirements, continuous monitoring obligations, and storage integrity protocol.

📌
Class III - Geological / Mineral permanence. All credits issued under TTS Annex A carry Class III permanence, reflecting a >1,000-year storage horizon in deep geological formations or stable mineral carbonate phases. Buffer pool contributions of 2–15% of gross verified credits apply, with the specific rate set by the project's Storage Integrity Risk Rating (SIRR) assessed at validation and each verification. Class III credits are eligible for the Teravent Permanent Removal label.

TTS v1.0 - Annex A

This pathway is governed exclusively by the Teravent Technology-Based Carbon Standard (TTS v1.0). No external registry, standard, or methodology is referenced or incorporated. All requirements - additionality, quantification, durability, safeguards, and credit issuance - are defined within TTS v1.0 and Annex A specifically.

Teravent Technology Credit - Serial Number Format (TTS Annex A · Removal)
TCR TTS R DAC US 00087 2025 000001
Registry TCR
Standard TTS v1.0
Pathway Code DAC
Credit Type TTC-R - Removal Credit
Durability Class III · Geological/Mineral

Four approved methodology variants

TTS v1.0 Annex A approves four discrete methodology types for the Direct Air Capture pathway. Each code represents a distinct capture chemistry with its own energy requirements, monitoring frequency, storage route, and default leakage deductions. A facility may combine multiple capture trains under separate methodology codes where each is independently metered.

💡
Selecting the right methodology: The methodology code must match the primary capture chemistry deployed at the facility. Where a project stages multiple capture technologies (for example, piloting an electrochemical train alongside an established solid sorbent line), both codes must be declared in the PDD and metered on independent CO₂ flow instrumentation.
DAC-M01
Solid Sorbent DAC with Geological Injection
Amine-functionalised or metal-organic-framework sorbents cycle through temperature or pressure swings to bind and release atmospheric CO₂

Solid sorbent systems draw ambient air across structured contactors coated with a CO₂-selective sorbent (typically amine-functionalised or metal-organic-framework materials). Once saturated, the sorbent is regenerated using low-grade heat (temperature-vacuum swing) or moisture, releasing a high-purity CO₂ stream for compression and geological injection. This is the most commercially mature DAC pathway, with the largest fleet of operating reference facilities.

Permanence
Class III · Geological
Buffer Pool
2–8% (by SIRR)
Metering Requirement
Continuous CO₂ flow, ±2% accuracy
Energy Source
Low-grade heat + electricity; grid factor applied
Leakage Deduction
Grid emissions factor per TLP v1.0
Storage Route
Saline aquifer or depleted reservoir (Annex G)
Key Monitoring Indicators
  • Continuous CO₂ capture rate (t/hr) at contactor outlet via calibrated flow metering
  • Sorbent regeneration energy consumption (thermal and electrical) logged per cycle
  • Grid electricity emissions factor (real-time or hourly-matched where available) per Lifecycle GHG Assessment Protocol TLP v1.0
  • Injection well pressure, temperature, and CO₂ purity at wellhead
  • Sorbent lifecycle records - replacement frequency, degradation rate, and disposal or regeneration pathway
DAC-M02
Liquid Solvent DAC with Geological Injection
Aqueous hydroxide solvent (KOH/Ca(OH)₂ cycle) contacts air in a packed tower, followed by causticisation and calcination to release CO₂

Liquid solvent DAC contacts ambient air with an aqueous alkaline solution (typically potassium hydroxide) in a packed absorption tower, forming a carbonate solution. The carbonate is then causticised with lime and calcined at high temperature (the KOH/Ca(OH)₂ cycle) to release a concentrated CO₂ stream and regenerate the solvent. This methodology requires substantial high-temperature heat input and is typically paired with a dedicated low-carbon energy supply.

Permanence
Class III · Geological
Buffer Pool
2–8% (by SIRR)
Metering Requirement
Continuous CO₂ flow, ±2% accuracy
Energy Source
High-temperature calciner heat (~900°C) + electricity
Leakage Deduction
Calciner fuel-source emissions factor
Storage Route
Saline aquifer or depleted reservoir (Annex G)
Key Monitoring Indicators
  • Continuous CO₂ capture rate at solvent regeneration outlet via calibrated flow metering
  • Calciner fuel type and consumption - natural gas, biomass, or electric calciners each carry distinct baseline factors
  • Lime (CaO) make-up rate and pellet reactor efficiency
  • Solvent concentration and carryover losses to atmosphere or waste stream
  • Injection well integrity monitoring per Module 4 storage protocol
DAC-M03
Moisture-Swing & Electrochemical DAC
Humidity-driven ion-exchange resins or bipolar membrane electrodialysis cells capture and release CO₂ without high-temperature heat

Moisture-swing sorbent systems exploit the humidity sensitivity of certain ion-exchange resins, which bind CO₂ when dry and release it when exposed to moisture - eliminating the need for thermal regeneration. Electrochemical variants use membrane-based cells to directly capture and concentrate CO₂ from air using an applied electric potential. Both approaches are earlier-stage than DAC-M01 and DAC-M02 and are frequently eligible for the Frontier Technology designation.

Permanence
Class III · Geological
Buffer Pool
4–10% (by SIRR - elevated, earlier-stage TRL)
Metering Requirement
Continuous CO₂ flow, ±2% accuracy
Energy Source
Electricity only; low-grade heat for humidity control
TRL Screening
Additionality auto-satisfied at TRL ≤7
Storage Route
Geological injection or mineral carbonation
Key Monitoring Indicators
  • Continuous CO₂ capture rate at outlet via calibrated flow metering
  • Cell or resin cycle energy consumption per tonne CO₂ captured
  • Technology Readiness Level (TRL) documentation updated at each verification for TRL-based additionality screening
  • Membrane or resin degradation rate and replacement schedule
  • Water balance - moisture-swing systems require humidity cycling water accounting under DNSH water stress provisions
DAC-M04
DAC with Basalt Mineralisation Storage
Captured CO₂ dissolved in water and injected into reactive basaltic formations, forming stable carbonate minerals in place of geological injection

This methodology pairs any of the DAC-M01 through DAC-M03 capture chemistries with a mineral storage route rather than conventional saline aquifer injection. Captured CO₂ is dissolved in water and injected into reactive basaltic or peridotite formations, where it reacts with calcium and magnesium silicates to form stable solid carbonate minerals - typically within months to a few years, offering a faster path to demonstrable permanence than dissolved-phase aquifer storage. Site-specific reactive transport modelling and post-injection monitoring wells are mandatory.

Permanence
Class III · Mineral
Buffer Pool
2–6% (by SIRR - lowest reversal risk once mineralised)
Mineralisation Confirmation
Monitoring wells + geochemical sampling required
Water Requirement
Elevated - CO₂ dissolution water make-up assessed under DNSH
Leakage Deduction
Water treatment and pumping energy emissions
Seismic Protocol
Required per Module 5 seismic risk assessment
Key Monitoring Indicators
  • Continuous CO₂ capture and dissolution rate via calibrated flow and water-injection metering
  • Reactive transport model validation against monitoring well geochemistry (minimum annual)
  • Mineralisation confirmation sampling - carbonate phase identification at representative depths
  • Injection pressure and induced seismicity monitoring per Module 5 seismic risk protocol
  • Water sourcing and consumption records for DNSH water stress compliance

Which emission sources must be counted

TTS v1.0 Module 3 requires a full lifecycle GHG emissions inventory within the project boundary, deducted from gross captured CO₂ to arrive at the Net TTC figure. A source may be excluded only where its inclusion would reduce the net carbon benefit (conservative assumption) and this is documented in the PDD. The following assessment applies to all four DAC methodology variants.

Required
Captured CO₂ (Gross)
Primary benefit quantity. Continuously metered CO₂ mass flow at the capture outlet using calibrated instrumentation to ±2% accuracy, independently verified against injection or mineralisation-side metering.
Required
Energy Input Emissions
All electricity and thermal energy consumed by the capture, regeneration, compression, and transport train, applying the applicable grid emissions factor or verified renewable/nuclear PPA documentation under the Lifecycle GHG Assessment Protocol (TLP v1.0).
Required where material
Upstream Sorbent / Solvent Production
Embodied emissions from manufacturing and periodically replacing sorbent, solvent, membrane, or resin materials, amortised over their operational lifetime per unit CO₂ captured.
Required where material
Transport & Injection Energy
Compression, pipeline or truck transport, and wellhead injection energy consumption between the capture facility and the storage or mineralisation site.
Excluded
Capture Equipment Embodied Carbon
Manufacturing emissions of the fixed capture facility structure (contactors, vessels, foundations) are excluded from the project boundary - capital equipment lifecycle carbon is addressed separately under TLP v1.0 facility-level disclosure, not deducted from Net TTC.
Excluded - Prohibited Use
Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR)
Storage of captured CO₂ for the purpose of enhanced oil recovery is categorically excluded from TTS v1.0 eligibility under Module 1 project exclusions, regardless of storage permanence claims.

Measurement, reporting
& verification

Teravent's Science Advisory Board assesses each pathway against four MRV dimensions. Direct Air Capture carries the highest MRV confidence ratings of any pathway in the Teravent system, reflecting continuous instrumented metering and a well-defined engineering boundary.

Capture QuantificationVery High
Storage MonitoringVery High
Permanence ConfidenceVery High
Additionality ClarityVery High
🔬 Measurement Requirements - TTS Module 3

Net TTC quantification requires continuous CO₂ mass flow metering at ±2% accuracy at both the capture outlet and the injection or mineralisation wellhead, using instrumentation independently calibrated by an accredited VVB. Storage confirmation for geological injection requires wellhead pressure and temperature monitoring, periodic pressure falloff testing, and - for larger facilities - satellite InSAR ground-deformation monitoring. For basalt mineralisation, dedicated monitoring wells with geochemical sampling confirm carbonate mineral formation. All facility energy inputs are reconciled against grid emissions factors or renewable/nuclear procurement documentation under the Lifecycle GHG Assessment Protocol (TLP v1.0), updated annually.

Demonstrating additionality

TTS v1.0 Module 2 requires all projects to pass a three-test additionality framework, with a Technology Readiness Level (TRL) screen applied ahead of the common practice test. Because DAC remains at an early commercial stage relative to conventional industrial processes, most facilities registering today qualify for a streamlined additionality pathway.

1
TRL-Based Common Practice Screen
Projects deploying a capture technology at Technology Readiness Level 7 (system prototype demonstration in an operational environment) or below automatically satisfy the common practice test - DAC at this maturity is not considered standard, unsubsidised industry practice anywhere in the world. Facilities using a TRL 8–9 mature commercial design (typically DAC-M01) must instead complete a full common practice survey of comparable regional deployments.
2
Regulatory Surplus Test
The capture and storage activity must not be mandated by any legally binding carbon capture obligation, emissions performance standard, or facility permit condition under national or sub-national law. Where a jurisdiction imposes a carbon capture mandate for new industrial construction, projects must demonstrate the DAC facility's capture rate or storage duration exceeds the mandated minimum.
3
Financial Additionality Test
Carbon revenue must be necessary for the project's financial viability. Project developers must submit a discounted cash flow analysis demonstrating that, absent carbon credit revenue and net of any 45Q-equivalent tax credits or direct government grants (which must be disclosed under Module 8), the facility's levelised cost of capture and storage exceeds available offtake or product revenue at commencement.
ℹ️
Government incentive disclosure: Where a project receives direct government grants, capital cost subsidies, or per-tonne tax credits for the same captured CO₂, this must be disclosed to the TSA at registration under Module 8. Double-claiming the same carbon benefit under both a government incentive programme and Teravent credits is prohibited.

Leakage types & deductions

TTS v1.0 Module 3 defines three leakage types applicable across all engineered pathways. DAC projects are primarily subject to energy-source and upstream input leakage; market leakage is generally de minimis given DAC's independence from land and biomass feedstock markets.

Energy-Source Leakage
Grid Electricity Displacement
Where a DAC facility draws electricity from a constrained grid, its consumption may increase marginal fossil generation elsewhere on the grid. Facilities without a dedicated renewable or nuclear power purchase agreement must apply the regional marginal emissions factor to all consumed electricity.
Deduction: applicable regional grid factor, TLP v1.0
Upstream Input Leakage
Sorbent / Solvent Lifecycle
Manufacturing and periodic replacement of sorbents, solvents, membranes, or ion-exchange resins carries embodied emissions from chemical production, which must be amortised across the material's operational lifetime and deducted from gross captured CO₂.
De minimis threshold: 2% of gross capture
Induced Fossil Extraction Leakage
Enhanced Oil Recovery Risk
Because EOR storage is categorically prohibited under TTS v1.0, projects must demonstrate - through chain-of-custody documentation and independent storage-site verification - that stored CO₂ is not directed to any oil or gas recovery operation, whether at the primary site or via third-party offtake.
Zero-tolerance exclusion · verified each period

Buffer pool & reversal risk

All Annex A credits carry Class III Geological or Mineral permanence (>1,000-year storage horizon), the highest durability classification in the Teravent Standards System. Buffer pool contributions protect credit buyers against reversal events - unintended CO₂ migration or seepage from the storage formation. Buffer rates are set by the project's Storage Integrity Risk Rating (SIRR).

Methodology SIRR Rating Buffer Pool Rate Primary Reversal Risks
DAC-M01 Solid Sorbent Low 2–8% Wellbore integrity failure; caprock breach at injection formation
DAC-M02 Liquid Solvent Low 2–8% Wellbore integrity failure; solvent carryover to atmosphere reducing net capture
DAC-M03 Moisture-Swing / Electrochemical Low–Medium 4–10% Elevated technology risk at lower TRL; wellbore integrity where geological injection used
DAC-M04 Basalt Mineralisation Very Low 2–6% Pre-mineralisation dissolved-phase migration prior to carbonate formation; induced seismicity
⚠️
Reversal notification: Project proponents must notify the TSA within 72 hours of discovering a reversal event (e.g. detected CO₂ migration outside the storage complex, wellbore integrity failure, or confirmed seepage exceeding the monitoring threshold). Buffer pool credits are cancelled proportionally to the verified carbon loss. Storage operators additionally carry 30-year post-closure monitoring obligations following the end of injection or mineralisation activity.

Key registration criteria

Projects must meet all of the following minimum requirements to qualify for registration under TTS Annex A. Additional methodology-specific requirements are detailed in the Annex A methodology tables for each DAC-M code.

Continuous CO₂ mass flow metering installed at the capture outlet and, where applicable, the injection wellhead, calibrated to ±2% accuracy by an accredited instrumentation provider
Ten-stage registration process completed, from technology eligibility assessment through validation to ongoing verification, per TTS Module 6
Seventeen-element Project Design Document submitted, including a storage integrity plan and a post-closure obligations statement
Three-test additionality demonstrated with TRL-based screening applied first; TRL documentation updated at each verification
Full lifecycle GHG emissions inventory submitted per the Lifecycle GHG Assessment Protocol (TLP v1.0), covering all energy inputs, upstream materials, and transport
Storage Integrity Risk Rating (SIRR) assessed by an accredited VVB at validation; buffer pool contribution of 2–15% applied to gross verified credits
Explicit written confirmation that no captured CO₂ is directed to enhanced oil recovery or any other prohibited use under Module 1
Seismic risk assessment and Do No Significant Harm review covering water use, water quality, and induced seismicity for geological or mineral injection sites
Government production incentive or capital grant disclosure submitted at registration and updated at each verification period
30-year post-closure monitoring commitment documented through a legal instrument acceptable to the TSA, covering the storage or mineralisation site after injection activity ends

Sustainable Development
Goal alignment

All Teravent registered Direct Air Capture projects must complete an SDG impact assessment at registration and at each verification period. Three SDGs are systematically tracked for this pathway. Projects may apply for co-benefit quality labels where independently verified indicators are met.

SDG 13 · Climate Action SDG 9 · Industry, Innovation & Infrastructure SDG 7 · Affordable & Clean Energy
Zero Fossil Input+
Facilities powered entirely by verified renewable or nuclear electricity and low-carbon process heat, with REC or PPA documentation, are eligible for the Teravent Zero Fossil Input co-benefit label.
Frontier Technology+
First-of-kind or novel capture chemistries (typically DAC-M03) designated by the TSA Technical Advisory Panel, with an independently peer-reviewed methodology, are eligible for the Frontier Technology label.
Water Positive+
Projects demonstrating net-positive local water balance - including water recovery from atmospheric humidity or moisture-swing operation - are eligible for the Water Positive label where hydrological monitoring data is provided.
Community Benefit+
Facilities with verified local employment creation, skills-transfer programmes, or community consultation outcomes exceeding baseline requirements are eligible for the Community Benefit+ label at Premium and Frontier certification tiers.

Deployment scope: Global - DAC is not constrained by land quality, biomass availability, or growing season, and can be sited wherever low-carbon energy and suitable geological or mineral storage formations co-locate, including industrial hubs, sedimentary basins, and basaltic terrains.

⚡ Direct Air Capture · TTS Annex A

Ready to register your
DAC facility?

Submit a Project Concept Note under TTS v1.0 Annex A to begin your registration. Select the DAC-M code matching your capture chemistry, install continuous CO₂ metering to ±2% accuracy, and appoint an accredited VVB to validate your PDD and storage integrity plan.