Teravent Registry v2.0 Now Live From June 2026 - Submit your carbon removal project for review
Teravent
Access Registry
17 Technology-Based Carbon Pathway · TTS Annex I
💎

Synthetic Carbon
Materials
TTS v1.0 - Annex I

Synthetic Carbon Materials converts captured CO₂ directly into stable solid carbon products - carbon fibre, graphene, carbon nanotubes, and carbon black - through electrochemical or thermochemical reduction. Rather than storing carbon underground, this pathway locks it into durable manufactured materials with verified service lives, embedding atmospheric or industrial CO₂ into products used in aerospace composites, construction reinforcement, batteries, and industrial rubber and pigments.

Technological TTS v1.0 Annex I ⏳ Class II · Material ● Active
Submit SCM Project View TTS v1.0 Annex I →
100–1,000 yr
Storage timescale (Class II)
>50 yr
Minimum verified service life
$200–$600
Current cost per tonne
3
Approved methodologies
SCM-M01 through SCM-M03
Teravent Methodology Codes · TTS Annex I
View TTS Annex I →

How this pathway works

Synthetic Carbon Materials pathways convert captured CO₂ into solid elemental or near-elemental carbon products through electrochemical reduction (applying an electric potential to split CO₂ into carbon and oxygen, typically in a molten salt or aqueous electrolyte) or thermochemical conversion (high-temperature decomposition, often catalytically assisted). The resulting carbon is fashioned into engineered materials - carbon fibre for structural composites, few-layer graphene for electronics and coatings, carbon nanotubes for advanced materials, or carbon black for tyres, rubber, and pigments - each carrying the converted CO₂ within the finished product's molecular structure.

Under the Teravent Technology-Based Carbon Standard (TTS v1.0) Annex I, Synthetic Carbon Materials projects earn Teravent Technology Credits of the Removal type (TTC-R) for verified net tonnes of CO₂ converted to stable solid carbon products, net of full lifecycle project emissions. Unlike geological or mineral storage pathways, durability here is a function of the manufactured product's own service life - meaning the strength of the carbon credit claim depends directly on independent engineering verification of how long the specific product will remain in use before disposal, recycling, or degradation.

Three methodology variants are approved under Annex I, differentiated by the target carbon material and its typical end-use application. Each requires product-specific service-life documentation, since durability class is assigned per application rather than per methodology alone.

📌
Class II - Material permanence, service-life dependent. Credits issued under TTS Annex I typically carry Class II permanence (100–1,000 years, buffer 7–25%), reflecting long-lived engineered material applications with a minimum verified service life of 50 years. Short-lived applications of the same underlying material technology may instead be assigned Class I permanence (10–100 years, buffer 15–35%) if the documented product service life falls below the Class II threshold.

TTS v1.0 - Annex I

This pathway is governed exclusively by the Teravent Technology-Based Carbon Standard (TTS v1.0). No external registry, standard, or methodology is referenced or incorporated. All requirements - additionality, quantification, durability, safeguards, and credit issuance - are defined within TTS v1.0 and Annex I specifically.

Teravent Technology Credit - Serial Number Format (TTS Annex I · Removal)
TCR TTS R SCM DE 00015 2025 000001
Registry TCR
Standard TTS v1.0
Pathway Code SCM
Credit Type TTC-R - Removal Credit
Durability Class II · Material (service-life dependent)

Three approved methodology variants

TTS v1.0 Annex I approves three discrete methodology types for the Synthetic Carbon Materials pathway, differentiated by the target carbon product and its typical end-use application. All three require a documented, independently assessed product service life to determine the durability class assigned at credit issuance.

💡
Service life is assessed per application, not per material: The same carbon fibre technology could be embedded in a 50-year aerospace composite or a 5-year consumer good - only the former qualifies for Class II crediting. Projects must document the specific end-use application and provide independent engineering evidence of the service life claimed, not simply cite generic material properties.
SCM-M01
Carbon Fibre & Structural Composites
CO₂-derived carbon fibre embedded in long-lived aerospace, automotive, or construction composite materials

Carbon fibre produced from CO₂-derived carbon (via electrochemical reduction to a carbon precursor, followed by spinning and carbonisation) is woven into structural composites for aerospace fuselage components, automotive body panels, or construction reinforcement. These applications typically carry the longest documented service lives of any synthetic carbon material, particularly aerospace-grade composites subject to rigorous engineering certification and multi-decade operational tracking.

Typical Durability
Class II · Material (50+ yr, aerospace/construction)
Buffer Pool
7–15% (by service-life confidence)
Service-Life Evidence
Aerospace certification records or engineering design life
Metering Requirement
CO₂ mass converted per batch, ±2% via mass balance
Energy Source
Electrochemical reduction; grid factor applied
End-of-Life Tracking
Chain-of-custody to disposal or recycling required
Key Monitoring Indicators
  • CO₂ mass converted to carbon precursor per production batch, verified by mass balance and material composition analysis
  • Independent engineering service-life assessment specific to the end-use application (aerospace, automotive, or construction)
  • Electrochemical cell energy consumption per tonne carbon produced, logged for lifecycle deduction
  • Product distribution and installation tracking to the specific end-use application claimed
  • End-of-life disposition monitoring - recycling, incineration, or landfill - since this affects long-term carbon retention
SCM-M02
Graphene & Advanced Carbon Nanomaterials
CO₂ electrochemically reduced to graphene, carbon nanotubes, or related nanomaterials for electronics, coatings, and battery applications

Molten salt or aqueous electrolysis can reduce CO₂ directly to few-layer graphene or carbon nanotube structures, which find use in battery electrodes, protective coatings, structural composite additives, and electronic components. Service life varies substantially by application - battery electrode material may see a 10–15 year product life, while graphene incorporated into permanent structural coatings or embedded in concrete or composite matrices can achieve multi-decade service lives, requiring careful application-specific documentation.

Typical Durability
Class I or II (application dependent)
Buffer Pool
15–30% (wider range given application variability)
Service-Life Evidence
Independent engineering assessment per specific application
Metering Requirement
CO₂ mass converted per batch, ±2% via mass balance
Worker Safety
Nanomaterial handling protocol required under Module 5
TRL
5–7, frequently Frontier Technology eligible
Key Monitoring Indicators
  • CO₂ mass converted per production batch, verified by mass balance and material composition analysis (Raman spectroscopy or equivalent)
  • Independent engineering service-life assessment specific to the declared end-use application (battery, coating, composite additive)
  • Electrolysis cell energy consumption per tonne material produced, logged for lifecycle deduction
  • Worker exposure monitoring for nanomaterial handling per occupational health and safety protocol
  • Product distribution and end-of-life disposition tracking
SCM-M03
Carbon Black for Industrial & Construction Use
Thermochemical conversion of CO₂ to carbon black, substituting fossil-derived carbon black in tyres, rubber, and pigment applications

Carbon black - a fine particulate carbon product used as a reinforcing filler in tyres and rubber goods, and as a pigment in inks, coatings, and plastics - is conventionally produced from incomplete combustion of petroleum or coal-derived feedstocks. This methodology instead thermochemically decomposes captured CO₂ (often via methane pyrolysis using CO₂-derived syngas, or direct thermal reduction) to produce an equivalent carbon black product, substituting for the fossil-derived material while embedding the converted CO₂ in the manufactured good.

Typical Durability
Class I · Material (10–100 yr, tyre/rubber lifespan)
Buffer Pool
15–35% (shorter service life, higher buffer)
Service-Life Evidence
Product category service life (tyre wear cycle, rubber good lifespan)
Metering Requirement
CO₂ mass converted per batch, ±2% via mass balance
Fossil Substitution
Displacement of conventional carbon black documented
End-of-Life
Tyre/rubber disposal or incineration releases embedded carbon
Key Monitoring Indicators
  • CO₂ mass converted per production batch, verified by mass balance and carbon black grade analysis (ASTM particle size/structure standards)
  • Product category service-life documentation (typical tyre wear-out period, rubber good lifespan) per end-use category
  • Thermochemical process energy consumption logged for lifecycle deduction
  • Fossil-derived carbon black displacement volume, to substantiate the substitution claim where relevant
  • End-of-life disposition tracking - incineration of tyres/rubber releases the embedded carbon, requiring credit expiry at documented end of service life

Which emission sources must be counted

TTS v1.0 Module 3 requires a full lifecycle GHG emissions inventory within the project boundary, deducted from gross converted CO₂ to arrive at the Net TTC figure.

Required
Converted CO₂ (Gross)
Primary benefit quantity. CO₂ mass converted to solid carbon product per production batch, verified by mass balance and material composition analysis.
Required
Conversion Process Energy
Electricity (electrochemical reduction) or thermal energy (thermochemical conversion) consumed by the carbon conversion process, applying the applicable grid emissions factor per TLP v1.0.
Required
CO₂ Source Capture & Transport
Where CO₂ is sourced from a separate capture facility (DAC, industrial point source), associated capture and transport emissions must be assessed unless already fully accounted under a separate registered capture pathway.
Required where material
Manufacturing & Fabrication Energy
Energy consumed in shaping the raw carbon material into a finished product (spinning carbon fibre, compounding carbon black into rubber) where this occurs within the project boundary.
Excluded
Underlying Product's Non-Carbon Components
Emissions associated with other materials in the finished product (resin matrix in composites, rubber polymer in tyres) are excluded from this pathway's boundary - only the CO₂-derived carbon fraction is credited.
Excluded - Prevents Double Counting
Overlapping CCUS Materials Utilisation Claims
Where the same converted CO₂ tonnes would otherwise be registered under CCUS Materials Utilisation (Annex C, CCU-M05), only one registration is permitted - Annex I applies where the primary purpose and methodology is dedicated synthetic carbon material production.

Measurement, reporting
& verification

Teravent's Science Advisory Board assesses each pathway against four MRV dimensions. Conversion quantification is high confidence given controlled batch production, but service-life confidence varies significantly by application - the single largest driver of buffer pool rate variation across the pathway.

Conversion QuantificationHigh
Service-Life ConfidenceMedium (application-dependent)
Permanence ConfidenceMedium–High
Additionality ClarityVery High
🔬 Measurement Requirements - TTS Module 3

Converted CO₂ mass is quantified through mass balance analysis at the conversion cell or reactor, cross-checked against material composition analysis of the finished carbon product (elemental analysis, Raman spectroscopy for graphitic materials, or ASTM standard test methods for carbon black) to confirm the carbon content matches the claimed CO₂ conversion. The defining MRV challenge for this pathway is service-life verification - an independent engineering assessment specific to the declared end-use application is required at registration, distinguishing this pathway from geological or mineral storage where physical containment can be directly monitored. Chain-of-custody tracking to the product's actual installation and, ultimately, its end-of-life disposition, is required throughout the crediting period.

Demonstrating additionality

TTS v1.0 Module 2 requires all projects to pass a three-test additionality framework, with a Technology Readiness Level (TRL) screen applied ahead of the common practice test. Most Synthetic Carbon Materials technologies remain pre-commercial or early commercial, giving this pathway very high additionality clarity relative to more mature TTS pathways.

1
TRL-Based Common Practice Screen
Projects deploying CO₂-to-carbon conversion technology at Technology Readiness Level 7 or below automatically satisfy the common practice test - direct electrochemical or thermochemical conversion of CO₂ to solid carbon products remains uncommon at commercial scale across all three methodology variants, with SCM-M02 (graphene/nanomaterials) frequently qualifying for Frontier Technology designation.
2
Regulatory Surplus Test
The conversion activity must not be mandated by any legally binding carbon utilisation requirement or product content standard. Where a jurisdiction mandates recycled-content or carbon-negative content in specific product categories, projects must demonstrate the CO₂-derived carbon fraction exceeds the mandated minimum.
3
Financial Additionality Test
Carbon revenue must be necessary for project viability. Developers must submit a discounted cash flow analysis, net of any government grants or tax incentives (disclosed under Module 8) and net of product sale revenue, demonstrating that CO₂-derived carbon production costs exceed those of conventional fossil-derived material absent carbon credit income.
ℹ️
Government incentive disclosure: Where a project receives direct government grants, capital cost subsidies, or per-tonne carbon utilisation tax credits for the same converted CO₂, this must be disclosed to the TSA at registration under Module 8. Double-claiming the same carbon benefit under both a government incentive programme and Teravent credits is prohibited.

Leakage types & deductions

TTS v1.0 Module 3 defines three leakage types applicable across all engineered pathways. Synthetic Carbon Materials projects are primarily subject to energy-source leakage and a market-substitution consideration unique to this pathway.

Energy-Source Leakage
Grid Electricity Displacement
Where electrochemical or thermochemical conversion equipment draws electricity from a constrained grid, its consumption may increase marginal fossil generation elsewhere. Facilities without a dedicated renewable power purchase agreement must apply the regional marginal emissions factor.
Deduction: applicable regional grid factor, TLP v1.0
Market Substitution Leakage
Fossil-Derived Material Displacement
Where CO₂-derived carbon black or carbon fibre displaces conventional fossil-derived production (SCM-M03), the displaced fossil-derived capacity may simply supply another buyer rather than being retired, requiring a market displacement assessment where claimed as an avoided-emissions co-benefit.
Default: 3–6%, assessed where substitution claimed
CO₂ Source Double-Counting Risk
Overlap with Registered Capture Pathways
Where the CO₂ source is a co-located capture facility already registered under a separate Teravent pathway (e.g. DAC, CCUS), chain-of-custody documentation must confirm the same captured CO₂ is not credited twice - once at capture and again at conversion.
Zero-tolerance exclusion · verified each period

Buffer pool & durability class

Durability class for Annex I credits is determined by the documented, independently verified service life of the specific end-use application - not by the underlying carbon material technology alone. Buffer pool rates scale inversely with service-life confidence.

Methodology / Application Typical Durability Class Buffer Pool Rate Primary Reversal Risks
SCM-M01 Aerospace/Construction Composite Class II (50+ yr) 7–15% Premature component failure or decommissioning ahead of design life
SCM-M02 Structural Coating/Additive Class II (50+ yr) 15–20% Application-specific uncertainty; less established long-term performance data
SCM-M02 Battery Electrode Class I (10–15 yr) 25–30% Shorter product life; battery recycling releases embedded carbon
SCM-M03 Carbon Black (Tyre/Rubber) Class I (10–100 yr) 15–35% Product wear cycle and disposal releases embedded carbon at end of service life
⚠️
Credit expiry at end of service life: Unlike geological or mineral storage credits, Synthetic Carbon Materials credits carry a defined expiry aligned to the documented product service life. Where a product is confirmed disposed of, incinerated, or otherwise releases its embedded carbon ahead of the documented service life, proponents must notify the TSA within 30 days and buffer pool credits are cancelled proportionally. Products confirmed recycled into an equivalent long-lived application may have their crediting period extended subject to VVB review.

Key registration criteria

Projects must meet all of the following minimum requirements to qualify for registration under TTS Annex I. Additional methodology-specific requirements are detailed in the Annex I methodology tables for each SCM-M code.

CO₂ mass conversion metering via mass balance, cross-verified by material composition analysis of the finished carbon product
Independent engineering service-life assessment submitted at registration, specific to the declared end-use application, determining Class I or Class II eligibility
Ten-stage registration process completed, from technology eligibility assessment through validation to ongoing verification, per TTS Module 6
Seventeen-element Project Design Document submitted, including product service-life documentation and end-of-life disposition plan
Three-test additionality demonstrated with TRL-based screening applied first; TRL documentation updated at each verification
Chain-of-custody documentation confirming no double counting where CO₂ source is a separately registered capture facility, and where materials utilisation overlaps with CCUS (Annex C, CCU-M05)
Worker health and safety protocol submitted for nanomaterial handling (SCM-M02), covering exposure monitoring and protective equipment requirements
Product distribution and end-of-life disposition tracking system in place for the full crediting period
Government production incentive or capital grant disclosure submitted at registration and updated at each verification period

Sustainable Development
Goal alignment

All Teravent registered Synthetic Carbon Materials projects must complete an SDG impact assessment at registration and at each verification period. Three SDGs are systematically tracked for this pathway. Projects may apply for co-benefit quality labels where independently verified indicators are met.

SDG 9 · Industry, Innovation & Infrastructure SDG 12 · Responsible Consumption & Production SDG 13 · Climate Action
Frontier Technology+
TSA TAP-designated first-of-kind CO₂-to-graphene or nanomaterial deployments (typically SCM-M02) with independently peer-reviewed methodology are eligible for the Frontier Technology label.
Circular Feedstock+
Projects displacing conventional fossil-derived carbon black or fibre production, with verified market substitution data, are eligible for the Circular Feedstock label.
Zero Fossil Input+
Facilities powered entirely by verified renewable or nuclear electricity for the conversion process are eligible for the Zero Fossil Input co-benefit label.
Community Benefit+
Facilities demonstrating verified local employment creation, advanced manufacturing skills transfer, or safe nanomaterial handling training programmes are eligible for the Community Benefit+ label.

Deployment scope: Global, concentrated near advanced manufacturing hubs with access to low-carbon electricity and existing carbon fibre, graphene, or carbon black production infrastructure - currently most active in East Asia, Western Europe, and North America.

💎 Synthetic Carbon Materials · TTS Annex I

Ready to register your
synthetic carbon project?

Submit a Project Concept Note under TTS v1.0 Annex I to begin your registration. Select the SCM-M code matching your target carbon material, commission an independent service-life assessment for your specific end-use application, and appoint an accredited VVB to validate your PDD.